| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 873.82 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Com o presente estudo pretendemos comparar os resultados obtidos na bateria de testes FMS® pelos nadadores juvenis entre o nível de elite e não elite. Adicionalmente, verificamos a relação entre o nível dos praticantes e o score total da avaliação FMS®. Para isso, 32 indivíduos voluntários de ambos os sexos entre os 13 e os 16 anos (14.99 ± 0.13 anos de idade) fizeram parte do grupo elite enquanto que 17 indivíduos voluntários de ambos os sexos entre os 13 e os 15 anos (14.65 ± 0.19) formavam parte do grupo não elite. A aplicação da bateria de testes foi realizada transversalmente no local onde os sujeitos treinavam e antes de iniciar o treino. Esta bateria de avaliação foi composta por sete padrões de movimentos fundamentais avaliando equilíbrio, mobilidade e estabilidade. O resultado consistia em 4 possibilidades, variando de zero a três, sendo que três a melhor pontuação possível. Os dados recolhidos permitem-nos concluir que o score total do FMS® é afetado pelos diferentes níveis competitivos, nomeadamente o nível de elite e não elite (p= 0.000; ES= 1.35). Podemos observar que o grupo de nadadores de melhor nível desportivo evidenciaram melhores valores no score total da avaliação realizada. Existe diferenças estatisticamente significativas em 4 dos 12 testes, dizendo respeito a 3 padrões de movimento, sendo eles o “Deep Squat”, “Hurdle Step” e “Trunk Stability Push Up” (p<0.05, ES > 0.99). No que diz respeito à relação do score total do FMS® dos grupos elite e não-elite com a classificação de pontuação FINA, foi possível verificar que 41% da pontuação FINA poderá ter uma relação direta com os padrões de movimentos avaliados na bateria de testes FMS®. Assim, podemos concluir que quanto superior for o nível competitivo, melhor será a classificação nesta bateria de testes, sugerindo uma melhor competência neuromuscular e consecutivamente menor predisposição para a lesão desportiva.
With the present study we intend to compare the results obtained in the battery of FMS® tests by juvenile swimmers between the elite and non-elite levels. In addition, we checked the relation between the practitioner level and the total points of the FMS® assessment. To that end, 32 volunteers of both sexes between the ages of 13 and 16 (14.99 ± 0.13 years of age) were part of the elite group whereas 17 volunteers of both sexes between the ages of 13 and 15 (14.65 ± 0.19) were part of the non-elite group. The application of the testicular battery was performed transversally at the place where the swimmers trained and before starting the training. This battery of evaluation was composed of seven patterns of exercise evaluating balance, mobility and stability. The result consisted of 4 possibilities, ranging from zero to three, being three the best score possible. The data collected allow us to see that the total FMS® score is affected by the different competitive levels, namely the elite and non-elite levels (p = 0.000; ES = 1.35). We can observe that the group of swimmers of higher sport level showed better values in the total score of the evaluation made. Statistically significant differences were observed in 4 of the 12 tests, that are relative to 3 movement patterns: "Deep Squat", "Hurdle Step" and "Trunk Stability Push Up" (p <0.05, ES> 0.99). Regarding the relation between the FMS® score of the elite and non-elite groups with the FINA score, it was possible to verify that 41% of the FINA score could have a direct relation with the movement patterns evaluated in the test battery FMS®. Thus, we can conclude that the higher the competitive level, the better the classification in this battery of tests, suggesting a better neuromuscular competence and a consequent lower predisposition to sports injury.
With the present study we intend to compare the results obtained in the battery of FMS® tests by juvenile swimmers between the elite and non-elite levels. In addition, we checked the relation between the practitioner level and the total points of the FMS® assessment. To that end, 32 volunteers of both sexes between the ages of 13 and 16 (14.99 ± 0.13 years of age) were part of the elite group whereas 17 volunteers of both sexes between the ages of 13 and 15 (14.65 ± 0.19) were part of the non-elite group. The application of the testicular battery was performed transversally at the place where the swimmers trained and before starting the training. This battery of evaluation was composed of seven patterns of exercise evaluating balance, mobility and stability. The result consisted of 4 possibilities, ranging from zero to three, being three the best score possible. The data collected allow us to see that the total FMS® score is affected by the different competitive levels, namely the elite and non-elite levels (p = 0.000; ES = 1.35). We can observe that the group of swimmers of higher sport level showed better values in the total score of the evaluation made. Statistically significant differences were observed in 4 of the 12 tests, that are relative to 3 movement patterns: "Deep Squat", "Hurdle Step" and "Trunk Stability Push Up" (p <0.05, ES> 0.99). Regarding the relation between the FMS® score of the elite and non-elite groups with the FINA score, it was possible to verify that 41% of the FINA score could have a direct relation with the movement patterns evaluated in the test battery FMS®. Thus, we can conclude that the higher the competitive level, the better the classification in this battery of tests, suggesting a better neuromuscular competence and a consequent lower predisposition to sports injury.
Description
Keywords
Fms® Grupo Elite Grupo Não Elite Natação