Center for Health Technology and Services Research

Funder

Organizational Unit

Publications

Publication . Prazeres, José Filipe Chaves Pereira; Passos, Lígia; Simões, José Augusto Rodrigues; Simões, Pedro Augusto Gomes Rodrigues Marques; Martins, Carlos; Teixeira, Andreia

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected the mental health of the general population, and for healthcare workers (HCWs) it has been no different. Religiosity and spirituality are known coping strategies for mental illnesses, especially in stressful times. This study aimed to describe the role of spiritual-religious coping regarding fear and anxiety in relation to COVID-19 in HCWs in Portugal. A cross-sectional quantitative online survey was performed. Socio-demographic and health data were collected as well as the Duke University Religion Index, Spirituality Scale, Fear of COVID-19 Scale, and Coronavirus Anxiety Scale. Two hundred and twenty-two HCWs participated in the study, 74.3% were female and 81.1% were physicians. The median age was 37 years (Q1, Q3: 31, 51.3). Religiosity was neither a significant factor for coronavirus-related anxiety nor it was for fear of COVID-19. Participants with higher levels in the hope/optimism dimension of the Spirituality Scale showed less coronavirus-related anxiety. Female HCWs, non-physicians, and the ones with a previous history of anxiety presented higher levels of fear and/or anxiety related to COVID-19. HCWs’ levels of distress should be identified and reduced, so their work is not impaired.

2020-12-30Journal article

Open access

Measuring adherence to inhaled control medication in patients with asthma: Comparison among an asthma app, patient self‐report and physician assessment

Publication . Cachim, Afonso; Pereira, Ana Margarida; Almeida, Rute; Amaral, Rita; Correia, Magna Alves; Marques, Pedro Vieira; Loureiro, Cláudia Chaves; Ribeiro, Carmelita; Cardia, Francisca; Gomes, Joana; Vidal, Carmen; Silva, Eurico; Rocha, Sara; Rocha, Diana; Marques, Maria Luís; Páscoa, Rosália; Morais, Daniela; Cruz, Ana Margarida; Santalha, Marta; Simões, José Augusto Rodrigues; Silva, Sofia da; Silva, Diana; Gerardo, Rita; Bom, Filipa Todo; Morete, Ana; Vieira, Inês; Vieira, Pedro; Monteiro, Rosário; Raimundo, Rosário; Monteiro, Luís; Neves, Ângela; Santos, Carlos; Penas, Ana Margarida; Regadas, Rita; Marques, José Varanda; Rosendo, Inês; Aguiar, Margarida Abreu; Fernandes, Sara; Cardoso, Carlos Seiça; Pimenta, F.; Meireles, Patrícia; Gonçalves, Mariana; Fonseca, Joao A; Jácome, Cristina

Background Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using an asthma app to support medication management and adherence but failed to compare with other measures currently used in clinical practice. However, in a clinical setting, any additional adherence measurement must be evaluated in the context of both the patient and physician perspectives so that it can also help improve the process of shared decision making. Thus, we aimed to compare different measures of adherence to asthma control inhalers in clinical practice, namely through an app, patient self-report and physician assessment. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of three prospective multicentre observational studies with patients (≥13 years old) with persistent asthma recruited from 61 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal. Patients were invited to use the InspirerMundi app and register their inhaled medication. Adherence was measured by the app as the number of doses taken divided by the number of doses scheduled each day and two time points were considered for analysis: 1-week and 1-month. At baseline, patients and physicians independently assessed adherence to asthma control inhalers during the previous week using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0–100). Results A total of 193 patients (72% female; median [P25–P75] age 28 [19–41] years old) were included in the analysis. Adherence measured by the app was lower (1 week: 31 [0–71]%; 1 month: 18 [0–48]%) than patient self-report (80 [60–95]) and physician assessment (82 [51–94]) (p < 0.001). A negligible non-significant correlation was found between the app and subjective measurements (ρ 0.118–0.156, p > 0.05). There was a moderate correlation between patient self-report and physician assessment (ρ = 0.596, p < 0.001). Conclusions Adherence measured by the app was lower than that reported by the patient or the physician. This was expected as objective measurements are commonly lower than subjective evaluations, which tend to overestimate adherence. Nevertheless, the low adherence measured by the app may also be influenced by the use of the app itself and this needs to be considered in future studies.

2023-02-15Journal article

Open access