| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.75 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Abstract(s)
Inicialmente, esta dissertação teve como objetivo o estudo comparativo entre dois
sistemas de gestão de aeronavegabilidade. O primeiro passo seria a introdução de aeronaves no
novo sistema (incluindo a metodologia de implementação e dados necessários), SAM, e de
seguida comparar-se-iam as funcionalidades e o funcionamento dos programas.
Contudo, devido a constrangimentos que foram surgindo, o foco de estudo da
dissertação passou a ser a viabilidade de upgrade de sistema de aeronavegabilidade. Tendo em
conta uma check list elaborada pelo autor, procedeu-se à comparação entre o que era necessário
para o bom funcionamento da empresa, o que o software CAMP Systems oferecia e de que
forma é que o SAM correspondia às necessidades da empresa.
Por fim, foi elaborada uma comparação direta entre os dois programas de acordo com
os elementos da check list (custo, gestão de aeronavegabilidade (Parte M), gestão de atividades
de manutenção (Part 145) e procurement). Nesta comparação destacaram-se os módulos dos
programas e a forma como estes se relacionam e dêm respostas às necessidades impostas pela
empresa no que toca à aeronavegabilidade e manutenção.
Airworthiness is a very important part of aviation safety and regulations. Therefore, it has always had a lot of attention drawn into it. For those reasons, engineers have developed softwares with the purpose of helping and facilitating their jobs. Those softwares help to manage the fleet as well as tools, to register the number of hours, cycles, landing and take-offs of aircraft or a component, to create and manage work orders as well as airworthiness directives and service bulletins, etc. These types of softwares also incorporate inventory management and procurement. From time to time, it is necessary to substitute the current software for a newer, more compatible one that better fits the company’s needs. In this dissertation, a software study comparison is made with the intent of justifying the transition’s feasibility between the company’s old software, CAMP Systems, to the new one, SAM. An inventory lifting was made to organize the company’s consumables, parts, components... in order, to then reorganize them so that the items would be fit to be inserted in the system. Afterwards, those items were introduced onto templates to import an aircraft into the new system, SAM. Following this, the company’s manual Part M was analyzed to study the requirements that had to be met so that the software would be acceptable for the company. Using those requirements as a software check list, the feasibility was address by comparing both software’s modules to the requirements of said list. The result of this process led to conclude that new airworthiness management software SAM was adequate meaning that it would respond to the functions already provided by CAMP whilst providing additionally efficiency including better costs.
Airworthiness is a very important part of aviation safety and regulations. Therefore, it has always had a lot of attention drawn into it. For those reasons, engineers have developed softwares with the purpose of helping and facilitating their jobs. Those softwares help to manage the fleet as well as tools, to register the number of hours, cycles, landing and take-offs of aircraft or a component, to create and manage work orders as well as airworthiness directives and service bulletins, etc. These types of softwares also incorporate inventory management and procurement. From time to time, it is necessary to substitute the current software for a newer, more compatible one that better fits the company’s needs. In this dissertation, a software study comparison is made with the intent of justifying the transition’s feasibility between the company’s old software, CAMP Systems, to the new one, SAM. An inventory lifting was made to organize the company’s consumables, parts, components... in order, to then reorganize them so that the items would be fit to be inserted in the system. Afterwards, those items were introduced onto templates to import an aircraft into the new system, SAM. Following this, the company’s manual Part M was analyzed to study the requirements that had to be met so that the software would be acceptable for the company. Using those requirements as a software check list, the feasibility was address by comparing both software’s modules to the requirements of said list. The result of this process led to conclude that new airworthiness management software SAM was adequate meaning that it would respond to the functions already provided by CAMP whilst providing additionally efficiency including better costs.
Description
Keywords
Aeronavegabilidade Camp Systems Sam Software