| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 813.6 KB | Adobe PDF |
Abstract(s)
Objetivos: Estudo 1. Compreender qual dos dois programas de intervenção é mais eficaz na
aquisição de capacidades necessárias para uma posição base correta e benéfico para o
desenvolvimento das habilidades motoras (HM) equilíbrio e coordenação em indivíduos com
síndrome de Down (SD). Estudo 2. Compreender se o uso da bateria de testes Motor
Competence Assessment (MCA) é adequado às caraterísticas motoras e cognitivas de
portadores com SD. Métodos: Estudo 1. A amostra foi composta por adultos com SD
provenientes de 4 instituições/associações de Lisboa, Castelo Branco, Guarda e Covilhã. Do
grupo de participantes (n=28) selecionados para participar no estudo formaram-se três
grupos: o Grupo de Controlo (G1) (n=14), o Grupo 2 (G2) (n=7) sujeito a um programa de
intervenção baseado no treino de preparação física específica do esqui alpino e o Grupo 3
(G3) (n=7) realizou um programa de treino com enfase na aprendizagem de Rollerski, uma vez
que as técnicas deste são semelhantes às do esqui alpino, mais especificamente a posição
base. Na análise estatística dos dados recolhidos, utilizaram-se o Teste T para amostras
emparelhadas e o teste Wilcoxon foram usados para inferência estatística intra-grupo e os
testes de Kruskal-Wallis e ANOVA para avaliar as diferenças inter-grupos, com o intervalo de
confiança 95%. Estudo 2. A amostra (n=28) foi composta por adultos com SD provenientes de 4
instituições/associações de Lisboa, Castelo Branco, Guarda e Covilhã. Foram aplicadas as
baterias de testes de avaliação de proficiência motora (PM), o BOT - Segunda Edição Brief
Form (BOT) e o MCA, em dois momentos distintos. Na análise estatística dos dados recolhidos,
utilizaram-se os testes de Kruskal-Wallis e ANOVA para avaliar as diferenças de ambos os
testes, com o intervalo de significância de 95%. Resultados: Estudo 1. Os resultados, ainda
que sem significado estatístico (p > 0,05), indicam que ambos os programas de treino são
benéficos no desenvolvimento das HM em estudo, apesar dos melhores valores serem obtidos
pelo G3, indicando que o programa de treino desenvolvido por este satisfaz melhor os
objetivos definidos. Estudo 2. Os resultados obtidos no estudo não apresentam significado
estatístico (p > 0.05), não sendo assim possível compreender se o uso do MCA é adequado em
indivíduos com SD em comparação com o BOT. Conclusões: Os resultados sugerem que o
programa de intervenção aplicado ao G3 parece mais adequado às caraterísticas desta. Não é
também, possível afirmar que o MCA é adequado a esta população, por inúmeras razões como
a idade e o número da amostra.
Objectives: Study 1: Evaluation of two Physical activity intervention aiming the motor skills (MS) development, such balance e coordination in individuals with Down Syndrome (DS). Study 2: Understand whether the use of the Motor Competence Assessment (MCA) test battery is suitable for motor characteristics and cognitive of carries with DS. Methods: Study 1, 28 individual with Down Syndrome from four institutions/associations, were divided in three groups: the control group (G1) (n=14), Group 2 (G2) (N=7). Program is based on the specific fitness training of alpine ski and the Group 3 (G3) (N=7) realized a training program with an emphasis on learning Rollerski, since the techniques is similar to ski’s, specifically on the base position. In the statistical analysis of the collected data, it was used the T-test for paired samples and the Wilcoxon test was used for the statistics inference intra-groups and the Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA to evaluate the inter-groups inter groups, with the 95% confidence interval. Study 2: Considering the same participants of Study 1It was applied Motor proficiency (MP), the BOT- Second Edition Brief Form (BOT)and the MCA, in distinct moments. In the statistical analysis of the collected data, it was used the Kruskal-Wallis e ANOVA tests to evaluate the differences between both tests with the amount 95% confidence interval. Results: Study 1: Even though the results still don’t present significant amount for be considered as statistic (p > 0,05), it appears that both training programs are benefic for the HM development in the study, even though the best results are obtained by the G3 (group 3), indicating that the training program developed by that group satisfies better that defined goals. Study 2: No significative statistic (p >0,05) were obtain when comparing the use of MCA it's adequate in individuals with Down Syndrome in comparison with the BOT. Conclusions: The results suggest that the intervention program applied by Group 3 seems more adequate to this characteristic. It is also, not possible to reaffirm that the MCA is more adequate to the population in the study, for numeral reasons such as age and data sample.
Objectives: Study 1: Evaluation of two Physical activity intervention aiming the motor skills (MS) development, such balance e coordination in individuals with Down Syndrome (DS). Study 2: Understand whether the use of the Motor Competence Assessment (MCA) test battery is suitable for motor characteristics and cognitive of carries with DS. Methods: Study 1, 28 individual with Down Syndrome from four institutions/associations, were divided in three groups: the control group (G1) (n=14), Group 2 (G2) (N=7). Program is based on the specific fitness training of alpine ski and the Group 3 (G3) (N=7) realized a training program with an emphasis on learning Rollerski, since the techniques is similar to ski’s, specifically on the base position. In the statistical analysis of the collected data, it was used the T-test for paired samples and the Wilcoxon test was used for the statistics inference intra-groups and the Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA to evaluate the inter-groups inter groups, with the 95% confidence interval. Study 2: Considering the same participants of Study 1It was applied Motor proficiency (MP), the BOT- Second Edition Brief Form (BOT)and the MCA, in distinct moments. In the statistical analysis of the collected data, it was used the Kruskal-Wallis e ANOVA tests to evaluate the differences between both tests with the amount 95% confidence interval. Results: Study 1: Even though the results still don’t present significant amount for be considered as statistic (p > 0,05), it appears that both training programs are benefic for the HM development in the study, even though the best results are obtained by the G3 (group 3), indicating that the training program developed by that group satisfies better that defined goals. Study 2: No significative statistic (p >0,05) were obtain when comparing the use of MCA it's adequate in individuals with Down Syndrome in comparison with the BOT. Conclusions: The results suggest that the intervention program applied by Group 3 seems more adequate to this characteristic. It is also, not possible to reaffirm that the MCA is more adequate to the population in the study, for numeral reasons such as age and data sample.
Description
Keywords
Rollerski Atividade Física (Af) Bruininks – Teste de Oseretsky de Proficiência Motora (Bot) Esqui Alpino Habilidades Motoras (Hm). Motor Competence Assessment (Mca) Proficiência Motora (Pm) Síndrome de Down (Sd)