| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A arquitectura como a vemos hoje é resultado da ausência de regras estabelecidas e especificas do belo. A arquitectura clássica regia-se por essas regras e se não fossem aplicadas, o objecto arquitectónico não poderia ser considerado belo. O arquitecto de hoje aplica a sua personalidade e maneira de ver o mundo na sua obra. Mas utilizará ainda os conceitos clássicos de maneira regulamentar como ditariam as leis clássicas ou será que também as reinterpreta à sua maneira? Analisaremos o período modernista de Le Corbusier e a sua estética de arquitectura e por último tentaremos fomentar esta ideia ao analisar uma ou duas obras de dois arquitectos contemporâneos que abarquem a arquitectura por vias diferentes. Esta tese pretende estabelecer um eixo condutor, com origem nos conhecimentos da antiguidade, no que concerne à arquitectura, até aos dias de hoje. Pretende-se avaliar se estes elementos ainda compõem a arquitectura contemporânea. A arquitectura dos dias de hoje: quebra no saber ou é apenas outra maneira de expressar o mesmo conhecimento?
Architecture as we see today is a result of the abstinence of established and specific rules of the beauty. Classic architecture followed these rules and if they we’re not used, the architectural object wouldn’t be considered beautiful. The architect of today applies his personality and his way of seeing the world to his work. But does he apply those concepts in the classical traditional way or does he rethink them? We will also study Le Corbusier’s modernism and his architectural aesthetics and for final, we’ll try to instigate this idea analyzing a few works of two contemporary architects who embrace architecture from a different view. This thesis hopes to link the ancient architectural knowledge to the present day, evaluate if the simplicity of its elements still composes the today architecture, even if without the same precision. Architecture of today: rupture of the known or another way to express the same knowledge?
Architecture as we see today is a result of the abstinence of established and specific rules of the beauty. Classic architecture followed these rules and if they we’re not used, the architectural object wouldn’t be considered beautiful. The architect of today applies his personality and his way of seeing the world to his work. But does he apply those concepts in the classical traditional way or does he rethink them? We will also study Le Corbusier’s modernism and his architectural aesthetics and for final, we’ll try to instigate this idea analyzing a few works of two contemporary architects who embrace architecture from a different view. This thesis hopes to link the ancient architectural knowledge to the present day, evaluate if the simplicity of its elements still composes the today architecture, even if without the same precision. Architecture of today: rupture of the known or another way to express the same knowledge?
Description
Keywords
Arquitectura contemporânea Arte nova Arquitectura clássica História da arquitetura
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Universidade da Beira Interior