| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.57 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Esta dissertação tem como tema principal o aprofundamento da discussão conceptual do
fenómeno da inovação social no contexto da problemática social da gentrificacão turística
em Lisboa. No campo teórico aborda o conceito de inovação, o fenómeno da inovação social
e sua questão paradigmática na construção teórica e prática, culminando em dois
paradigmas divergentes – o paradigma democrático e o paradigma tecnocrático da inovação
social. Assim sendo, partimos da seguinte pergunta de partida: em que medida o trabalho
desenvolvido por organizações, movimentos sociais ou coletivos relacionados com o
problema social da gentrificação turística em Lisboa, podem ser ou não “inovação social”?
Colocando como objetivo geral de pesquisa: identificar organizações, movimentos sociais
ou coletivos que estão a desenvolver soluções, alternativas, mudanças, defesa e garantia de
direitos para as pessoas e bairros afetados pela gentrificação turística em Lisboa. Para
responder e cumprir com o objetivo proposto, adotamos uma pesquisa de caráter
exploratório, de metodologia qualitativa, utilizando-se da técnica da entrevista
semiestruturada para a recolha de informações e da técnica de análise de conteúdo para a
interpretação dos dados textuais. Ao todo foram entrevistadas três associações e dois
coletivos de Lisboa. Com a análise da informação recolhida percebemos que as inovações
sociais alcançadas por estas associações e coletivos para solucionar e combater a
gentrificação turística estão a nível micro e macro no âmbito político, público e na defesa,
representação e garantia de direitos de pessoas, grupos, bairros e espaços públicos,
situando-as no paradigma democrático da inovação social.
This dissertation has as its principal theme the enhancement of the conceptual discussion of social innovation in the context of the social problems of tourist gentrification in Lisbon. In the theoretical field it discusses the concept of innovation, of social innovation and the paradigmatic issue in the theoretical and practical construction of social innovation, which culminates in two divergent paradigms - the democratic paradigm and the technocratic paradigm of social innovation. Therefore, we start from the following starting question: to what extent the work developed by organizations, social movements, or collectives related to the social problem of tourist gentrification in Lisbon, may or may not be "social innovation"? Putting as a general research objective: to identify organizations, social movements, or collectives that are developing solutions, alternatives, changes, defense, and guarantee of rights for people and neighborhoods affected by tourist gentrification in Lisbon. To answer and fulfill the proposed objective, we adopted research of exploratory nature, of qualitative methodology, using the semi-structured interview technique to collect information and the content analysis technique to interpret the textual data. In all, three associations and two Lisbon collectives were interviewed. With the analysis of the information collected, we realize that the social innovations achieved by these associations and collectives to solve and combat tourist gentrification are at the micro and macro level in the political, public, and in the defense, representation, and guarantee of rights of people, groups, neighborhoods, and public spaces, placing them in the democratic paradigm of social innovation.
This dissertation has as its principal theme the enhancement of the conceptual discussion of social innovation in the context of the social problems of tourist gentrification in Lisbon. In the theoretical field it discusses the concept of innovation, of social innovation and the paradigmatic issue in the theoretical and practical construction of social innovation, which culminates in two divergent paradigms - the democratic paradigm and the technocratic paradigm of social innovation. Therefore, we start from the following starting question: to what extent the work developed by organizations, social movements, or collectives related to the social problem of tourist gentrification in Lisbon, may or may not be "social innovation"? Putting as a general research objective: to identify organizations, social movements, or collectives that are developing solutions, alternatives, changes, defense, and guarantee of rights for people and neighborhoods affected by tourist gentrification in Lisbon. To answer and fulfill the proposed objective, we adopted research of exploratory nature, of qualitative methodology, using the semi-structured interview technique to collect information and the content analysis technique to interpret the textual data. In all, three associations and two Lisbon collectives were interviewed. With the analysis of the information collected, we realize that the social innovations achieved by these associations and collectives to solve and combat tourist gentrification are at the micro and macro level in the political, public, and in the defense, representation, and guarantee of rights of people, groups, neighborhoods, and public spaces, placing them in the democratic paradigm of social innovation.
Description
Keywords
Gentrificação Turística Inovação Inovação Social