| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Abstract(s)
A avaliação do risco de crianças e famílias é um processo extremamente complexo. Este tipo
de avaliação ocorre em contexto forense, o que torna a qualidade da relação estabelecida
entre o avaliador e o(s) entrevistado(s) particularmente sensível, determinando, por vezes,
a qualidade da informação recolhida. A relevância da avaliação precoce nas situações
negligência ou de maltrato por estas terem um impacto cumulativo severo na saúde mental
das crianças, que pode comprometer o seu futuro. Neste sentido, o relatório da CAFCE,
refere que 80,8% dos jovens que iniciaram o processo de medida tutelar educativa, tinham
pendentes os Processos de Promoção e Proteção. Esta dissertação tem como objetivo
contribuir para a validação da EEARF (2018) no contexto protetivo. A amostra forense foi
constituída por 19 famílias assistidas pela segurança social e a amostra não forense por 10
famílias que não estejam nesta condição. A análise dos fatores de risco aponta os problemas
legais, segurança social e família e parentalidade como fatores mais cotados. Quanto aos
fatores de proteção, os itens mãe pós-adolescente, elevado envolvimento nas atividades,
elevado nível de colaboração pais/avaliadores e mãe com o papel protetor são itens de
maior frequência. As hipóteses que a amostra forense possui mais fatores de risco e que a
amostra não forense possui mais fatores de proteção, foram aceites pela análise dos dados
colhidos, demonstrando a adequada sensibilidade do instrumento. A matriz metodológica
de análise de dados será de métodos mistos, tendo os dados tratados pela IBM SPSS
Statistics versão 28 na parte qualitativa.
Risk assessment of children and families is an extremely complex process. This type of evaluation takes place in a forensic context, which makes the quality of the relationship established between the evaluator and the interviewee(s) particularly sensitive, sometimes determining the quality of the information collected. The relevance of early assessment in situations of neglect or abuse, as these have a severe cumulative impact on children's mental health, which can compromise their future. In this sense, the CAFCE report states that 80.8% of the young people who started the process of educational tutelage had the Promotion and Protection Processes pending. This dissertation aims to contribute to the validation of EEARF (2018) in the protective context. The forensic sample consisted of 19 families assisted by social security and the non-forensic sample consisted of 10 families that aren’t in this condition. The analysis of risk factors points to legal problems, social security and family and parenting as the most cited factors. As for protective factors, the items postadolescent mother, high involvement in activities, high level of collaboration between parents/evaluators and mother with the protective role are items with the highest frequency. The hypotheses that the forensic sample has more risk factors and that the nonforensic sample has more factors that are protective were accepted by the analysis of the data collected, demonstrating the adequate sensitivity of the instrument. The methodological matrix for data analysis will be mixed methods, with the data treated by IBM SPSS Statistics version 28 in the qualitative part.
Risk assessment of children and families is an extremely complex process. This type of evaluation takes place in a forensic context, which makes the quality of the relationship established between the evaluator and the interviewee(s) particularly sensitive, sometimes determining the quality of the information collected. The relevance of early assessment in situations of neglect or abuse, as these have a severe cumulative impact on children's mental health, which can compromise their future. In this sense, the CAFCE report states that 80.8% of the young people who started the process of educational tutelage had the Promotion and Protection Processes pending. This dissertation aims to contribute to the validation of EEARF (2018) in the protective context. The forensic sample consisted of 19 families assisted by social security and the non-forensic sample consisted of 10 families that aren’t in this condition. The analysis of risk factors points to legal problems, social security and family and parenting as the most cited factors. As for protective factors, the items postadolescent mother, high involvement in activities, high level of collaboration between parents/evaluators and mother with the protective role are items with the highest frequency. The hypotheses that the forensic sample has more risk factors and that the nonforensic sample has more factors that are protective were accepted by the analysis of the data collected, demonstrating the adequate sensitivity of the instrument. The methodological matrix for data analysis will be mixed methods, with the data treated by IBM SPSS Statistics version 28 in the qualitative part.
Description
Keywords
Avaliação Crianças Família Proteção Risco