A carregar...
Publicação
A vontade política ou a (im)possibilidade de um ser político humano
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.48 MB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A vontade é por natureza considerada um conceito dado a múltiplas interpretações e a uma pertinência que se julga ou julgam conhecer e dominar, mas no alto do seu estatuto não consegue ser captado na sua intenção. Na origem desta convicção, vaga, mas generalizada, é possível identificar a suposição de uma (ir)racionalidade absoluta no agir político, moral, ético e um tender a esgotar a compreensão humana, pondo em causa as intenções de poder vigente, a sua suposta unidade mental e as decisões aí originadas. À luz desta perspetiva, o conceito de vontade revela-se soberano/absoluto, ambíguo e contraditório no modo como o ser humano se organiza no processo de humanização. Por esta razão, nesta tese, propomos que a contradição resulta do facto do ser humano não pretender alicerçar a sua condição humana numa vontade de ser de facto livre, humanizadora e diferente na igualdade segundo a natureza de cada um, ou seja, opta por dar existência a uma matriz política, que, para além de obsoleta, é violenta, ilusória e até enraizada num parecer ser que visa dominar e subjugar todo aquele que se oponha ao status quo vigente. Com efeito, a hipótese de um regime ontocrático passa a ser do domínio da utopia e do devaneio, porque o homem tem medo da existência de uma liberdade como fim que o possa conduzir a um conhecer-se a si mesmo e à eudaimonia. Para além do referido, considera-se que:
- o ser humano não pretende sacrificar e abdicar de interesses em prol de uma compensação assente numa vontade de ser mais memorável para a condição humana;
- a política limita-se a abarcar um conjunto de promessas levianamente feitas para as não cumprir, ou seja, a sua função e utilidade destroem a confiança da comunidade;
- há um desajustamento entre o que a vontade é e o que poderia/deveria ser, contudo um novo mundo é sempre possível se o agir político fizer uso de uma vontade liberta de uma intenção de domínio sobre o outro e do acentuar da desigualdade entre os indivíduos;
- é possível, aprendendo com os erros da matriz tradicional do agir humano, operar uma nova compreensão quanto ao modo e à forma como se vive a vida. Isto é, dar à existência um ser político efetivamente fundado numa vontade de ser de facto humano.
The will is naturally considered a concept given to multiple interpretations and to a relevance that one believes to know and master, but from the height of its status it cannot be captured in its intention. The origin of this belief, vague but widespread, it is possible to identify the assumption of an absolute (ir)rationality in political, moral, ethical acting, and tend to deplete human understanding, questioning the intentions of those in power, their alleged mental unit and there originated decisions. In light of this perspective, the concept of will reveals itself sovereign / absolute, ambiguous and contradictory in the way human being organizes himself in the process of humanization. For this reason, in this thesis, we propose that the contradiction results from the fact that the human being does not want to support its human condition in a will of being de facto free, humanizing and different in equality according to the nature of each one, i.e., chooses to give existence to a policy matrix, which, in addition to obsolete, is violent, delusional and even rooted in an appearing to be, which aims to dominate and subjugate everyone who opposes the existing status quo. Indeed, the hypothesis of an ontocratic regime becomes the domain of utopia and dreaminess, because man is afraid of the existence of a freedom as a means that can lead him to know himself and to eudaimonia. Besides the above, it is considered that: - Human being does not want to sacrifice and give up interests in favor of compensation based on a willingness to be more memorable for the human condition; - Policy limits itself to cover a set of frivolously made promises not to be accomplished, i.e., its function and usefulness destroy the confidence of the community; - There is a disparity between what a will is and what it could / should be, however, a new world is always possible if the political action will make use of a will released of an intention to dominate the other and to accentuate inequality among individuals; - It is possible, learning from the mistakes of the traditional matrix of human action, to operate a new understanding as to mode and manner life is lived. That is, to give existence a political being effectively established in a will to actually be human.
The will is naturally considered a concept given to multiple interpretations and to a relevance that one believes to know and master, but from the height of its status it cannot be captured in its intention. The origin of this belief, vague but widespread, it is possible to identify the assumption of an absolute (ir)rationality in political, moral, ethical acting, and tend to deplete human understanding, questioning the intentions of those in power, their alleged mental unit and there originated decisions. In light of this perspective, the concept of will reveals itself sovereign / absolute, ambiguous and contradictory in the way human being organizes himself in the process of humanization. For this reason, in this thesis, we propose that the contradiction results from the fact that the human being does not want to support its human condition in a will of being de facto free, humanizing and different in equality according to the nature of each one, i.e., chooses to give existence to a policy matrix, which, in addition to obsolete, is violent, delusional and even rooted in an appearing to be, which aims to dominate and subjugate everyone who opposes the existing status quo. Indeed, the hypothesis of an ontocratic regime becomes the domain of utopia and dreaminess, because man is afraid of the existence of a freedom as a means that can lead him to know himself and to eudaimonia. Besides the above, it is considered that: - Human being does not want to sacrifice and give up interests in favor of compensation based on a willingness to be more memorable for the human condition; - Policy limits itself to cover a set of frivolously made promises not to be accomplished, i.e., its function and usefulness destroy the confidence of the community; - There is a disparity between what a will is and what it could / should be, however, a new world is always possible if the political action will make use of a will released of an intention to dominate the other and to accentuate inequality among individuals; - It is possible, learning from the mistakes of the traditional matrix of human action, to operate a new understanding as to mode and manner life is lived. That is, to give existence a political being effectively established in a will to actually be human.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Vontade Poder Política Natureza Ser Prudência Medo Ontocracia Liberdade Humano