| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 336.28 KB | Adobe PDF | |||
| 1.18 MB | Adobe PDF | |||
| 1.2 MB | Adobe PDF | |||
| 863.96 KB | Adobe PDF | |||
| 1.09 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A encomenda de projeto para duas casas no lugar de Mãos é a justificação para as
reinterpretações da normalidade da forma arquitetónica e do habitar.
A ausência de matéria relevante na arquitetura sobre a normalidade da forma arquitetónica
serve a oportunidade para iniciar ideias básicas e fundamentais sobre o tema.
Este âmbito da normalidade formal na disciplina de design, em oposição à arquitetura,
já é considerado há largos anos e assim, será do design que retiraremos as primeiras
ideias. Partindo da compreensão isolada dos vários aspetos de norma e forma, até
a sobreposição das ideias, procuramos desconstruir as múltiplas peças das ideias e
compreender as suas dependências e relações. As interpretações procuram sempre
ser o mais abstratas e gerais possíveis para nunca colocar em causa o desenvolvimento
natural dos legados formais, porque o que nos interessa, nesta situação, é a interpretação
do normal.
A mesma situação existe no âmbito do habitar. A inexistência de precisão e coerência,
sob um ponto de vista geral, nas respostas que podemos encontrar sobre o que é
o habitar na arquitetura permite-nos explorar o domínio do fundamento da arquitetura
livremente. Neste sentido, Martin Heidegger, segundo uma perspectiva abrangente,
oferece-nos um entendimento fora da arquitetura, procurando sempre fundamentos em
lógicas de ordem superior até às particularidades do projeto, e é nesta visão que nos
iremos apoiar para a interpretação da função da casa.
Em última instância reserva-se a situação de integrar as ideias desenvolvidas para desenhar
um projeto em função delas. Numa lógica que ostenta os vários aspetos encontrados
e considerados válidos no contexto do projeto e, partindo do geral para o particular,
procuramos definir a morfologia de duas casas respondendo assim em primeiro lugar
aos aspetos que se demonstraram mais relevantes e com consequências mais profundas
no desenho até aos aspetos mais superficiais do projeto.
The project order for two houses in Mãos is the justification for the reinterpretation of the normality of architectural form and inhabit. The absence of relevant material in architecture on the normal fashion serves the opportunity to start basic and fundamental ideas on the subject. This scope in the design discipline, as opposed to architecture, is already considered for many years and so will the design retract the first ideas. Starting from isolated understanding of various aspects of norm and form, to the overlap of ideas, we try to deconstruct the multiple parts of ideas and understand their dependencies and relationships. The interpretations always try to be the most possible abstract and general to never calling into question the natural development of formal legacy, because what interests us in this situation is the interpretation of normal. The same situation exists in inhabit. The lack of precision and consistency, from a comprehensive view, in the answers we can find about what is inhabit in architecture allows us to explore the architectural basis of domain freely. In this regard, Martin Heidegger, in a comprehensive way in its perspective, gives us an understanding outside of architecture, always looking for foundations in logics of higher order to the peculiarities of the project, and it is this vision that we will support for the interpretation of function of the House. In the last resort reserves the situation to integrate the ideas developed to draw the design on the basis of them. A logic that boasts various found aspects and considered valid in the context of the project, and from the general to the particular, we seek to define the morphology to the houses thus responding first to the aspects that proved to be important and more profound consequences for the design to the more superficial aspects of the project.
The project order for two houses in Mãos is the justification for the reinterpretation of the normality of architectural form and inhabit. The absence of relevant material in architecture on the normal fashion serves the opportunity to start basic and fundamental ideas on the subject. This scope in the design discipline, as opposed to architecture, is already considered for many years and so will the design retract the first ideas. Starting from isolated understanding of various aspects of norm and form, to the overlap of ideas, we try to deconstruct the multiple parts of ideas and understand their dependencies and relationships. The interpretations always try to be the most possible abstract and general to never calling into question the natural development of formal legacy, because what interests us in this situation is the interpretation of normal. The same situation exists in inhabit. The lack of precision and consistency, from a comprehensive view, in the answers we can find about what is inhabit in architecture allows us to explore the architectural basis of domain freely. In this regard, Martin Heidegger, in a comprehensive way in its perspective, gives us an understanding outside of architecture, always looking for foundations in logics of higher order to the peculiarities of the project, and it is this vision that we will support for the interpretation of function of the House. In the last resort reserves the situation to integrate the ideas developed to draw the design on the basis of them. A logic that boasts various found aspects and considered valid in the context of the project, and from the general to the particular, we seek to define the morphology to the houses thus responding first to the aspects that proved to be important and more profound consequences for the design to the more superficial aspects of the project.
Description
Keywords
Forma Habitação Heidegger Norma Recuperação